Research summary №1·July 2026

Fuel for the work.

Zones, fat-burning, and the one change that makes most of us faster.

Start here · the whole report in a minute

The 60-second
version.

01 / RULE

What your body burns depends on how hard you go. Go easy and you run mostly on fat. Go hard and you run mostly on carbs. That's a hard physiological rule, and no diet trick changes it.

02 / TWIST

You can nudge the mix toward fat by training more, training fasted, or eating low-carb. But shifting your fuel mix doesn't by nature make you any faster.

03 / PRIZE

But most of these studies are done on professional or elite athletes, already with extremely low body fat. For any normal human the prize isn't the performance of the engine, it's power-to-weight. Lose a few kilos of spare fat and every hill shrinks.

04 / METHOD

So how do we lose fat while keeping the energy to train? The two trendy terms in recent research are metabolic flexibility and carb periodisation. In plain English: train your body to be good at burning both fat and carbs, and plan your carbs around your training.

05 / CARBS

The amount of carbs eaten during long races keeps climbing, and the guidelines have moved to meet it: 90 to 120g an hour. Recent research is showing positive signals for up to 150g/h, which for most people requires a lot of gut training.

06 / PROTEIN

And protein? A rare case where the marketing hype stands up under the microscope, one of the most widely evidenced areas of nutrition. 1.6 to 2.2g per kg of bodyweight a day covers most of us, and the returns flatten above that.

07 / STRENGTH

One of the best techniques for improving body composition (reducing fat while protecting and growing muscle) is resistance training. Two or three strength sessions a week sends a powerful signal to your body.

08 / PLAN

In many ways the conclusion is unglamorous: match your food to your training, day by day. Keep the carbs light on easy days, fuel the hard sessions properly, treat protein as non-negotiable.

09 / LIMITATIONS

It's worth caveating all of this. The majority of these studies are done on men, and on groups of highly trained athletes. Current work is correcting this, but for now these are known limitations in modern sports science.

Decoder · every acronym in this report

The terms,
in plain
English.

CHOCarbohydrate

The chemist's shorthand (carbon-hydrogen-oxygen), used everywhere in papers. "60g CHO/h" just means 60 grams of carbs an hour.

GLYCOGENYour carb tank

Carbs packed away in muscle and liver, ready to burn. Around 400–500g total, roughly 2,000 kcal. Empty it and you bonk.

LT1 / LT2Lactate thresholds 1 & 2

The two dividers in your effort range. Below LT1 is genuinely easy; above LT2 is genuinely hard. Everything between is the grey middle.

CROSSOVERThe fuel handover

The intensity where carbs overtake fat as your main fuel. Trained athletes push it later; that's what "a good aerobic engine" means.

FATMAXPeak fat-burning rate

The effort at which you burn fat fastest. Marked on the crossover curve, and it sits well below the crossover.

MPSMuscle protein synthesis

The rebuild process: your body assembling new muscle protein after a session. It stays elevated for 24–48 hours, which is why the 30-minute window is a myth.

TRETime-restricted eating

Intermittent fasting by the clock: all your food inside a set window. The common version is 16:8: fast for 16 hours, eat within 8.

TRAIN-LOWLow-carb availability training

Doing a session on purposely empty carb stores (fasted, or after depleting them) to push adaptation.

PERIODISATIONCarb periodisation

Matching carbs to the day's demand instead of eating the same every day. Big on hard days, lean on easy ones.

METABOLIC FLEXMetabolic flexibility

Being good at burning both fuels and switching between them cleanly, rather than being locked into one.

RED-SRelative energy deficiency in sport

What happens when you train hard on too little food for too long: hormones, bone and performance all suffer. The failure mode to avoid.

BONKHitting the wall

Running the carb tank dry mid-effort. The legs go, the pace collapses. You never bonk from running out of fat.

SGLT1 / GLUT5Gut transporters

The two "doors" carbs enter through: glucose uses one, fructose the other. Using both is how you absorb more than 60g an hour.

W/KGPower-to-weight

Watts you produce divided by the kilos you carry. The number that decides how fast you climb, and the one most amateurs can move.

01
Section 01

The rules of
the game.

The physiology you can't break.

01 · 01

Where fat
hands over
to carbs.

Push the effort up and your fuel gauge slides from fat to carbs. The handover has a name: the crossover.

Below it you're fat-fuelled and can go for hours. Above it you're burning your small, precious carb tank, and the clock starts.

✦ The physiological ceiling

Even at FatMax (the effort at which you are burning the most fat), a trained person on a normal diet burns about 0.5g of fat per minute, roughly 4.5 kcal.[Achten]

FATMAXPEAK FAT BURNINGCROSSOVERCARBSFATEASYMAX
Where the thresholds fall on the training zones
LT1First threshold
LT2Second threshold
RecoveryZ1EnduranceZ2TempoZ3SweetZ4ThresholdZ5VO₂maxZ6AnaerobicZ7
EASYMAX
RecoveryZ1
EnduranceZ2
LT1First threshold
TempoZ3
Sweet spotZ4
ThresholdZ5
LT2Second threshold
VO₂maxZ6
AnaerobicZ7
EASY · LT1 ENDS EASY, LT2 ENDS SUSTAINABLE · MAX
Model A · thresholds
Lactate thresholds

LT1 is where lactate first starts to rise above resting: the ceiling of genuinely easy, fat-fuelled work.

LT2 is where it starts accumulating faster than you can clear it, where carbs become the dominant energy source.

Model B · training zones
Training zones

The seven-zone model is the modern coaching standard. A finer grid that is more useful for prescribing work, as used for all sessions in Beina. It's the same axis, cut differently.

Fig 1. The two lactate thresholds mapped onto the seven-zone model.
01 · 02

A fitter engine
moves the
whole curve.

Where each engine hands over · % of VO₂max
MODERATELY ACTIVEcrosses over earlier
CROSSOVER 55%
WELL TRAINEDcrosses over 20 points later
CROSSOVER 75%
EASYthe fat window gets 20 points widerMAX
Fig 2. Trained athletes have a wider fat-fuelled band than moderately active ones. Cross-sectional, so it describes the difference rather than proving training caused it.[San-Millán]

Get fitter and the whole handover slides right: more fat burned, at higher intensities, before carbs take over.

The gap is wide. Well-trained athletes don't cross over until around 75% of VO₂max; moderately active ones cross nearer 55%. This is what "a good aerobic engine" physically is.

This varies hugely from person to person, highlighting the fact that nutrition, and specifically metabolism, are hugely personal. In one study of trained men, individuals ranged from 0.24g/min to 0.89g/min. Nearly fourfold, in the same training state.[Achten]

Diet moves the curve too. Train fasted or low-carb and you'll burn more fat at any intensity within days. More on that later…

01 · 03

One engine,
two fuel
supplies.

You can think of your muscle as a single combustion engine with two distinct sources of fuel.

Schematic · the athlete powerplantSheet 1 / 1 · not to scale
FAT≈ 70,000 kcalEFFECTIVELY BOTTOMLESSSTORED AROUND THE BODY,UNDER THE SKIN AND INSIDETHE MUSCLE ITSELFCARBS≈ 2,000 kcal · 500g~90 MIN OF HARD WORKSTORED AS GLYCOGEN,~80% MUSCLE · ~20% LIVERCOMMON RAILTRICKLE · 0.5g/MINMAX ≈ 4.5 kcal/MINTORRENT · 4g/MINMAX ≈ 16 kcal/MINTHE MUSCLEOUTPUT · WATTSBURNS WHATEVER ARRIVES.IT DOESN'T CARE WHICH TANK,IT CARES HOW FAST FUEL ARRIVES.At a typical race pace itwants ~20 kcal a minute.*FAT≈ 70,000 kcalUNDER THE SKIN AND INTHE MUSCLE ITSELFTRICKLE0.5g/MINMAX 4.5 kcal/MINCARBS≈ 2,000 kcal500g GLYCOGEN,~90 MIN OF HARD WORKTORRENT4g/MINMAX 16 kcal/MINTHE MUSCLEOUTPUTWATTSIT BURNS WHATEVERARRIVES, IT CARES HOWFAST, NOT WHICH TANKAt a typical race pace itwants ~20 kcal a minute.*
Fig 3. *We can assume this will vary significantly based on race type, and an individual's metabolism, but the rules remain well evidenced. The limit isn't how much fuel, it's how fast the line can deliver it. Both flow rates are total oxidation, which is why they are seen to run well above the 90–120g/h you can eat during a race.
✦ Why this is the whole story

You never bonk from running out of fat, you bonk from running out of carbs. That tiny tank is the limiter, which is exactly why the vast majority of athletes fuel hard races with carbs. "Better fat-burning" stretches the carb tank: a fuel-economy gain, not a bigger engine.

02
Section 02

The moves
you can make.

What, and when, you eat.

02 · 01

Top up the
tank while
you go.

For long or hard sessions, the widely accepted move is to feed the muscle directly, sparing your own glycogen so you bonk far later. See some specific guidelines below.

SessionCarbs / hourHow
Up to ~75 min~0Your tank covers it. A carb mouth-rinse still buys ~2–3% via a brain effect.
1–2.5 h, moderate–hard30–60gA gel or two, or a bottle of mix. Plain glucose is fine here.
2.5 h+ or racing60–90gNow you need a glucose + fructose blend to absorb this much.
Ultra / racing hard90–120gThe current guideline ceiling, and where most pros are now racing.
The live frontier120–150g+Tolerance and oxidation at these rates are being demonstrated, and some riders gut-train to 200g+. What isn't settled is whether it beats 120 on the clock. Months of gut training, and highly individual.
Swipe the table →
Gut intake · two transporters, two doors
GLUCOSE
SGLT1
60g/h
FRUCTOSE
GLUT5
+30–45g/h
TO THE
MUSCLE
90–120g/h
One door jams at 60. The second is narrower, not wider. Together they reach 90 to 120.
✦ Use two doors, not one

Glucose saturates its intestinal transporter near ~60g/h. Fructose goes through a different door and adds roughly 30 to 45g/h on top, which is how a trained gut reaches 90 to 120g/h. That's why the best fuels use a glucose-to-fructose blend (~1:0.8).[Jeukendrup · 2026 revision]

02 · 02

Feed the
adaptations.

An easy thing to forget: you don't actually get any fitter during a training session. Technically, you get weaker.

It is in the 24 to 48 hours after the work, when your body adapts to the stress you put it under, that fitness is gained. Which is why what you do in that window matters so much.

It is also the slightly upsetting reason why having a few beers after that big mission is probably the worst time to have a few beers :(

Clock 1 · refuel the tankcarbs · fastest in the first 0–2h
0h · tank empty, uptake wide open6h24h · full if you ate
Clock 2 · rebuild the machineprotein & sleep · elevated to ~48h
PEAK MPS · 2–6h
0h24h48h · back to baseline
Fig 4. Sleep and food speed both clocks. Heavy alcohol blunts the rebuild badly.[Burke · Parr]
The checklist · four Rs of recovery

Before any ice bath, massage gun or supplement, cover these four. They're the whole of recovery nutrition, in order of how fast they matter.[Bonilla]

R1First
Rehydrate
150%
OF THE FLUID YOU LOST

Weigh yourself before and after. Drink one-and-a-half times the deficit, with sodium so it stays in you.

R20–4h
Refuel
1.2g
PER KG BODYWEIGHT, PER HOUR

Carbs back into the tank. Only urgent if you train again within ~8 hours. Otherwise the daily total is what counts.

R30–48h
Repair
0.4g
PER KG, PER MEAL · 4 DOSES = 1.6G/KG

Quality protein across the day. This is the part that turns the session into fitness.

R4Nightly
Rest
7–9h
OF SLEEP · NON-NEGOTIABLE

Where the rebuild actually happens. A slow protein before bed helps; alcohol can undo all of your hard work.

02 · 03

Protein is
the rebuild.

Carbs fuel the session. Protein is what turns it into fitness.

Protein isn't just raw material, it's a signal. Leucine is the amino acid your muscle reads, and about 2.5g of it in one sitting is what flips the switch. That's the real reason whey wins: it's roughly 13% leucine against casein's 10% and soy's 8%.

The fascinating part is that protein raises muscle protein synthesis on its own, at rest, with no training at all.[Tang] Training amplifies it. The food alone starts it.

Our meta-analysis puts the daily protein target at 1.6g/kg, with the peak around 2.2.[Morton]

A day's protein · 75 kg athlete150g TOTAL
BREAKFAST
38g
LUNCH
38g
POST-RIDE
38g
DINNER
36g
Four doses of ~0.5g/kg, landing at 2.0g/kg for the day. In the lab, 4 × 20g every 3 hours beat both 2 × 40g and 8 × 10g over 12 hours. Whether it still matters across months of training is argued.[Areta]
✕ The anabolic window is dead

The 30-minute panic is finished. Muscle stays sensitised to protein for 24 hours or more after a hard session: the rebuild is a day-long window, not a half-hour one. What matters is your daily total, spread across the day. The only thing that's genuinely urgent post-session is carbs, and only if you train again within ~8 hours.

02 · 04

Burning fat:
the amateur's
superpower.

Those fuel-mix trials kept finding nothing on performance. Not because they studied the wrong people, but because they measured the wrong outcome for you.

They tested time-trial power at a fixed bodyweight. That is a fair test of whether shifting your fuel mix makes the engine stronger, and the answer is no.

But power is only half of how fast you go. The other half is what you carry up the hill, and those trials were never designed to move it. That's the lever they left on the table, and for most of us it's the bigger one.

The impact of losing 5kgs.
80kg22% fat
= 17.6kg of body fat carried
320 W ÷ 80kg4.00 W/kg
75kg17% fat
= 12.6kg of body fat carried
320 W ÷ 75kg4.27 W/kg
Power-to-weight+6.7%
Fat carried−5.0kg
40-min climb~1:40 faster[Martin]
A pro at 6% has nothing left to take off. If you're carrying spare fat, you do.

W/kg is bodyweight, as it is normally quoted. The climb estimate is modelled from cycling power physics on a sustained climb, and does include the weight of a bike and kit, which is why it is not simply 6.7% faster. Treat it as an illustration of the direction, not a prediction of your time.

02 · 05

Power
moves.

The rider above got faster by subtracting. The real magic is doing both at once: increasing muscle, while reducing fat. Body composition is the name of the game.

01
Action · protect the numerator

Lift weights 2–3× a week, and eat the protein to go with it.

In a deficit your body is deciding what to burn. Resistance training plus high protein is the instruction: burn the fat, keep the machine.

In a four-week trial of 40 overweight young men, everyone lifted six days a week in a 40% calorie deficit. The only thing that differed between the groups was how much protein they ate.[Longland]

2.4g/kg of protein
+1.2kg
lean mass gained, and 4.8kg of fat lost
1.2g/kg of protein
No change
lean mass held, and 3.5kg of fat lost

Same training, same deficit, double the protein: the difference is whether you hold the muscle or add to it. The direction holds for you, the magnitude almost certainly won't, because they were previously untrained and had far more spare adaptation to find.

02
Action · shrink the denominator, slowly

Lose it slower than you want to: 0.5–0.7% of bodyweight a week.

Two groups of elite athletes reached a similar scale weight at different speeds, and the bodies underneath were not alike. The slow group added lean mass. The fast group held theirs flat, and gave up the gain.[Garthe]

n=24 elite athletes, 13 slow and 11 fast. Losing fast didn't make them weaker. It cost them the muscle the slow group gained.

+2.1%
lean mass, losing ~0.7% a week
−0.2%
lean mass, losing ~1.4% a week
02 · 06

Keto &
fasting.

These two get bundled together, but they pull different levers.

Keto is what you eat: usually defined as under 50g of carbs a day, with the rest of your calories coming mostly from fat and protein. Fasting is when you eat: often practised as something like 16:8, fasting for 16 hours each day and eating within 8.

Keto

Very low carb, high fat, all the time. Within weeks it shifts your fuel mix hard toward fat, and that part is real and uncontested. It's also an established therapy for epilepsy and type-2 diabetes, so none of it is woo.

The catch is the top end. The carb system you've spent months down-regulating is exactly the one hard racing runs on, and the tank you're leaning on delivers 0.5g a minute.

Racing above easy pace? Wrong call
Fasting

Time-restricted eating and train-low sessions change when fuel is available, not what's on the plate the rest of the time. Going without switches on autophagy, the cellular clean-up.

Train fasted and you'll build better fat-burning machinery. Whether that machinery actually makes you faster has been tested directly, and the answer is below.

Useful in a window, never before a hard day
✕ Better fat-burning ≠ faster

In a 6-week trial, fasted training built better fat-burning machinery and delivered no detectable extra speed. Fasted and fed groups both improved their 60-minute time-trial by ~8%, and VO₂max by ~9%, with no difference between them.[Van Proeyen]

n=20 young men, 10 per group, 6 weeks. Small enough that a real difference could hide in it.

Fuel availability · a two-position switch, and you're always in one
Build
FED + PROTEIN
Clean-up
FASTED / LOW-FUEL
mTOR on · muscle adapts
autophagy off
WIRED
AGAINST
EACH OTHER
AMPK on · autophagy on
building off
Fig 5. This is the fasting axis, not the keto one. You can be fully fed, and fully low-carb, at the same time.
In conclusion

Both are useful tools, they just answer different questions. Fasting is about timing, and it earns its place on easy sessions and in off-season blocks, where teaching your body to work on less costs you nothing. Keep it away from the days you need to go hard and it's a free adaptation.

Keto is about composition, and it does what it says: a genuine shift in how you fuel, with real uses in an off-season block or a fat-loss phase. The trade is at the top end, so it suits periods where the top end isn't what you're chasing. Use both in a window, and come back out for race season.

02 · 07

Where the
game bites
back.

01

Heavy alcohol after training

Your body treats alcohol as a toxin and prioritises clearing it, blunting the rebuild clock. After a hard session, a heavy dose cut muscle protein synthesis 37% when taken with carbs, and still 24% when taken with protein. Protein blunts the damage. It doesn't stop it.[Parr]

n=8 physically active men. The dose was 1.5g/kg, about twelve standard drinks for an 80kg athlete. Two beers is not this.

02

Under-fuelling into a hole

Starve your body of energy and it starts breaking down its own muscle for fuel. Train hard and under-eat for too long and you finish fitter on paper but weaker in reality: RED-S.[Mountjoy]

02 · 08

Not to be
forgotten.

Three practical things that are worth leaning into.

The one we left out
Caffeine

The best-evidenced legal aid in endurance. 3 to 6mg/kg, about an hour before, worth roughly 2 to 3% on power and time-trial time.

3mg/kg performs about as well as 6, so start low. For a 75kg rider that's ~225mg, roughly two coffees. Practise it in training: it wrecks some people's sleep and some people's stomachs.

We said it four times
Train the gut

Told you to do it repeatedly and never said how. Here it is: take carbs on your long sessions, start at 60g/h, and add 10g/h every couple of weeks.

Use race products at race concentration, not something you'll never see again on the day. If your gut complains, hold at the last comfortable rate for another fortnight rather than pushing through.

Drink to thirst, not to a plan
Fluid & sodium

Sweat rates vary enormously, so weigh yourself before and after a long session and replace what you lost. In the heat, 500 to 800mg of sodium an hour keeps it in you.

You can also drink too much. Taking on more fluid than you sweat dilutes your blood sodium, which is hyponatraemia, and in a long event it is more dangerous than being a little dry.

02 · 09

Taboo
moves.

Two that get whispered about rather than written down. One is unglamorous but real; the other is everywhere in the peloton and barely stands up.

Old trick, real evidence
Bicarbonate of soda

Baking soda buffers the acid that floods a hard effort, so it helps the short, sharp stuff — 30 seconds to 12 minutes, repeated sprints, the final climb — not steady endurance. 0.2 to 0.3g/kg, 60 to 180 minutes before, worth around 2%.[Grgic]

The catch is your gut: neat bicarb means bloating and cramps, which is why it fell from fashion. It's back because hydrogel versions (Maurten's, used at WorldTour level) get it past the stomach. Legal, and worth practising before you race it.

Everywhere, barely stands up
Nicotine pouches

Pouches and snus are rife in pro cycling and team sport — used by roughly a quarter to a third of athletes. The pitch is focus, blunted effort and appetite control.[Mündel]

The evidence doesn't back it: of ten performance studies, two helped, one hurt, seven did nothing — no reliable edge, and it's addictive.[Mündel] WADA watches it rather than banning it, for now. Use has run well ahead of the science; "everyone's on it" is the reason, not proof.

Before you go

Remember
one thing.

Fuel the work, and fuel the adaptation. Eat for the session in front of you, protect your muscle, and lose the spare fat slowly.

Boring. Patient. And more than any shortcut on the internet can say. That's how most of us get genuinely faster.

Your coach has already read this

Putting it into
practice with Beina.

The science in this report sits in your coach's context on every message you send it. Ask about the grey middle, the 4Rs, what to eat before Saturday, and you're talking to something that has already read it.

Type /fuel and it stops being theory. Beina reads your actual planned sessions for the week ahead and your bodyweight, then puts the carbs where the work is: what to eat before each session and how many hours before, what to take during, whether the refuel after genuinely matters, plus a daily protein target.

/fuel min
Leaning out. The deficit sits on your easy days, protein climbs to protect the engine.
/fuel
Fuel the work required. Carbs periodised onto the sessions that actually need them.
/fuel max
Loading for performance. Top of the band, race week and the biggest blocks.

Then close the loop. Ask your coach to put two strength sessions a week into your plan and it writes them in, exercises and all, right alongside the rest of your training.

Start your 7-day trial
Beina
References · Appendix

Each entry gives the population and the effect, not just the name, because that's where most nutrition claims go wrong on their way to a headline.

Van Proeyen et al. 2011 · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00907.2010
n=20 young men, 10 per arm, 6 weeks. Fasted vs fed training: both +8% 60-min TT, both +9% VO₂max, no difference between groups.
Parr et al. 2014 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0088384
n=8 physically active men, crossover. Alcohol at 1.5g/kg (~12 drinks) cut myofibrillar protein synthesis 37% with carbs, 24% with protein.
Achten & Jeukendrup 2003 · PMID 14598198
n=55 trained men. Peak fat oxidation 0.52 ± 0.15 g/min at 62.5 ± 9.8% VO₂max, individuals spanning 0.24 to 0.89.
Morton et al. 2018 · PMID 28698222
Meta-analysis, 49 studies, 1,863 people, resistance training. Protein breakpoint at 1.62g/kg/day, CI reaching ~2.2. Not an endurance trial.
Garthe et al. 2011 · PMID 21558571
n=24 elite athletes. Losing 0.7%/wk: lean mass +2.1%. Losing 1.4%/wk: lean mass unchanged, −0.2%. Fat fell in both.
Longland et al. 2016 · 10.3945/ajcn.115.119339
n=40 overweight young men, 4 weeks, 40% deficit, training 6 days/wk. At 2.4g/kg protein: +1.2kg lean, −4.8kg fat. At 1.2g/kg: lean held, −3.5kg fat.
San-Millán & Brooks 2018 · 10.1007/s40279-017-0751-x
Cross-sectional: professional cyclists vs moderately active vs metabolic syndrome. Professionals oxidise more fat at any given intensity. Describes a difference, does not prove training caused it.
"From Metabolism to Medals", the 2026 revision · The Journal of Nutrition
Review of the carbohydrate literature. Moves during-exercise carbs from a 90g/h ceiling to 90–120g/h for trained athletes, on the basis that both exogenous and whole-body oxidation rise at these intakes. Notes that field practice has run ahead to 120–200g/h, and that a performance benefit at those rates is not yet substantiated.
High-carb peloton review 2025 · 10.1007/s40279-025-02372-6
Narrative review of ≥100g/h practice. Finds no clear evidence it reduces reliance on your own stores.
Mountjoy et al. (IOC) · RED-S consensus statement
Energy availability = (intake − exercise energy expenditure) ÷ kg fat-free mass. Below ~30 kcal/kg FFM/day is where endocrine, bone and performance consequences appear.
Tang et al. 2009 · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00076.2009
n=18 young men, 6 per group. Whey vs casein vs soy, at rest and after resistance exercise. Whey raised muscle protein synthesis ~93% more than casein at rest and ~122% more after exercise, tracking leucine content. Small groups, so treat the exact percentages loosely.
Areta et al. 2013 · 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.244897
n=24 trained men, 8 per group, 12 hours after resistance exercise on 80g of whey total. 4 × 20g every 3h beat 2 × 40g every 6h and 8 × 10g every 1.5h. Later work questions whether the distribution effect survives over months.
Grgic et al. 2021 (ISSN position stand) · 10.1186/s12970-021-00458-w
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand — a review of the sodium bicarbonate literature. Ergogenic at 0.2–0.5g/kg (0.3 typical), taken ~60–180min pre-exercise, for high-intensity efforts of ~30s–12min; typical improvement ~2%. Main limiter is GI distress, cut by enteric-coated capsules, split dosing, a carb-rich meal or hydrogel delivery.
Mündel 2017 · PMID 28791650
Sports Medicine review of nicotine in sport. Of ten performance studies, two ergogenic, one ergolytic, seven no change — no reliable benefit. Documents high use among athletes by self-report and anti-doping urine analysis despite this. Nicotine is on WADA's Monitoring Program, not the Prohibited List.
Still to verify
Seiler & Kjerland 2006 (the ~80% easy split, meaning below the first lactate threshold, not 80% in the recovery zone), Brooks & Mercier 1994, Jeukendrup 2014, Burke et al. 2017, Bonilla et al. 2020, Martin et al. 1998. These are pending the same population-and-effect pass as the entries above, and this line stays here until they've had it.

How this was built. Drafted from peer-reviewed primary studies, landmark reviews, meta-analyses and position stands, then corrected after external review. Where the evidence is contested, or the study population differs from yours, the text says so rather than rounding it into a headline. Spotted something wrong? Tell us and we'll fix it and say what changed.

Beina. Remove the anxiety from endurance prep. Educational, not individual medical or dietary advice.